Confused about canon's photoquality.? - noise reduction sample bose
At the moment I have a Canon SX100 IS. I'm always on the lookout for new pictures. Even at low ISO (80-100) in low-light images are noisy. Prolonged exposure to noise reduction artifacts. I wanted to take my digital SLR camera at first, but they are expensive and I change lenses frequently. I met some imageson dpreview.com Flickr as indicated below. Sony and Panasonic tend to be very nice photos of long-term exposure and high ISO .... produce
Sony shows H10: ISO 1600
http://a.img-dpreview.com/gallery/sonydsch10_samples/dsc00265.jpg
Canon SX100 example:
ISO 1600 http://a.img-dpreview.com/gallery/canonsx100is_samples/img_0614.jpg
ISO800 http://a.img-dpreview.com/gallery/canonsx100is_samples/img_0578.jpg
Panasonic FZ28: ISO low, but longer exposure time. (Note the freshness)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/unknownviper/2850694829/in/pool-793920 @ N24 /
Why Review Canon photo quality is always higher than others? I am thinking seriously about one of these cameras. What is your opinion?
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Noise Reduction Sample Bose Confused About Canon's Photoquality.?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Not Sony or Panasonic, none of them is best used as an asset as a Canon or Nikon digital SLR.
If I were you I would be a digital SLR camera like the Nikon D40, or if you are looking for a buy point and shoot camera, a Nikon Coolpix.
I, Nikon, Canon, Pentax, Minolta, Sony, Olympus and shot himself, I still can not find that I prefer my Nikon D40 or D50. I have used some Coolpix cameras and are very comfortable to aim and fire regulations.
Post a Comment